In the Wilderness

Bosch_-_Saint_John_the_Baptist_in_the_Desert_Jheronimus van Aken  (c. 1450 – 9 August 1516)


Species across land, rivers, and seas decimated as humans kill for food in unsustainable numbers and destroy habitats


The number of wild animals on Earth has halved in the past 40 years, according to a new analysis.

Creatures across land, rivers, and the seas are being decimated as humans kill them for food in unsustainable numbers, while polluting or destroying their habitats, the research by scientists at World Wildlife Fund and the Zoological Society of London found.

“If half the animals died in London zoo next week it would be front page news,” said Professor Ken Norris, ZSL’s director of science. “But that is happening in the great outdoors.
This damage is not inevitable but a consequence of the way we choose to live.” He said nature, which provides food and clean water and air, was essential for human wellbeing.

“We have lost one half of the animal population and knowing this is driven by human consumption, this is clearly a call to arms and we must act now,” said Mike Barratt, director of science and policy at WWF.
He said more of the Earth must be protected from development and deforestation, while food and energy had to be produced sustainably.

The number of animals living on the land has fallen by 40% since 1970.
From forest elephants in central Africa, where poaching rates now exceed birth rates, to the Hoolock gibbon in Bangladesh and European snakes like the meadow and asp vipers, destruction of habitat has seen populations tumble.

Marine animal populations have also fallen by 40% overall, with turtles suffering in particular.
Hunting, the destruction of nesting grounds and getting drowned in fishing nets have seen turtle numbers fall by 80%.

A second index in the new Living Planet report calculates humanity’s “ecological footprint”, ie the scale at which it is using up natural resources.

Currently, the global population is cutting down trees faster than they regrow,
catching fish faster than the oceans can restock,
pumping water from rivers and aquifers faster than rainfall can replenish them,
and emitting more climate-warming carbon dioxide than oceans and forests can absorb.

The report concludes that today’s average global rate of consumption would need 1.5 planet Earths to sustain it.
But four planets would be required to sustain US levels of consumption, or 2.5 Earths to match UK consumption levels.

The fastest decline among the animal populations were found in freshwater ecosystems, where numbers have plummeted by 75% since 1970.
“Rivers are the bottom of the system,” said Dave Tickner, WWF’s chief freshwater adviser. “Whatever happens on the land, it all ends up in the rivers.” For example, he said, tens of billions of tonnes of effluent are dumped in the Ganges in India every year.

As well as pollution, dams and the increasing abstraction of water damage freshwater systems. There are more than 45,000 major dams – 15m or higher – around the world.
“These slice rivers up into a thousand pieces,” Tickner said, preventing the healthy flow of water.
While population has risen fourfold in the last century, water use has gone up sevenfold. “We are living thirstier and thirstier lives,” he said.


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/29/earth-lost-50-wildlife-in-40-years-wwf

Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://secretgardening.wordpress.com/2014/09/29/in-the-wilderness/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. pretty appalling. I love all these old pictures you post

    • Thank you.
      No one listens until it’s gone beyond bad, beyond depressing analysis, beyond terrifying predictions, beyond a nightmare–and become a fully shattering catastrophe all around us.

      Ever since I was a child, I’ve wished I could find the parts of Bosch paintings that weren’t gruesome & embarrassing (as appropriate as that might be, under the circumstances), but now something beautiful is something sad because it’s doomed. The lamb is meant to represent an innocent victim of the wickedness of mankind.

  2. Very deep analysis and I love the painting.

    • Just repeating the science they’ve been figuring out for decades—-and warning us about,
      and counting the numbers fallen while we fucked around: too indifferent, too lazy, too greedy, or too stupid to respond appropriately and take action.
      Surprisingly beautiful & langourous melancholy.

  3. Sigh…the ‘elephant in the room’ always seems to be human population. Few people seem willing to say that sustainability in the long run means not only living less wastefully, but also aiming for a smaller and stable population. Instead people just quote estimated future population growth as if it is a given.

    • ABSOLUTELY.
      I remember seeing the projections decades ago & being horrified—and disgusted.
      It is at the root of everything.
      When they were discussing pronouncing one of the recent popes a saint, I mulled over the logic. It seemed to me that–whatever the original good intentions—anyone who not only forbade protection from rampant disease, or the poverty resulting from being overwhelmed, or the horrors of neglected children, or the physical dangers to underage mothers—-but actively encouraged reproducing—caused more harm the world over than wars, plagues, or crime. It was destroying life on a scale that made the underlying declaration of the sanctity of life sound insane.

      • It seems to me we are faced with a choice between choosing to limit our population (as soon as possible) or having it limited for us in the long run by the fallout of climate change, displacement, conflict etc. etc. I am afraid we (and our politicians) are unlikely to choose the first route.

      • I know—And when China gave the mandatory arrangement a try, the self-righteous indignation among Americans was overwhelming.
        Although I think that they didn’t bother to make the distinction between the fact that it was a policy that will have to be explored sooner or later, and the fact that because people decided that they wanted only boys (imagine how that must be playing out now): hundreds of thousands of baby girls were abandoned or murdered.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s